Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Subdivision Private Lane topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hanson pre-application: Fountain Green commission advises engineer redraw for compliant road, cul-de-sac and utilities

Fountain Green Planning Commission ยท January 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Family applicants presented a preliminary plan to split roughly 4.5 acres into multiple lots; commissioners flagged access, fire-turnaround, right-of-way width and utility requirements and asked the applicants to return with revised engineering drawings and a Johnson DeMille review.

Mark Newman and Chris Hanson presented conceptual plans Jan. 8 to subdivide family-owned acreage and asked whether access could be provided via a private lane rather than extending a public street. Commissioners said the commissions role is to review compliance with ordinance standards and to recommend approval to the appeal authority/engineer for technical sign-off.

Access and safety: Commissioners repeatedly flagged emergency access, turnaround geometry and maintenance access as critical constraints on approving a subdivision served by a narrow (28-foot) right-of-way. They said trash collection, snowplowing and fire apparatus turning must be considered and suggested options such as moving the proposed road alignment, providing a hammerhead or cul-de-sac large enough for emergency vehicles, or shifting lot lines to meet the 0.455-acre minimum lot-size requirement spelled out in the ordinance.

Utilities and exemptions: Commissioners reminded applicants that some simple-subdivision exemptions only apply where municipal utilities already exist; bringing municipal water and sewer into the site would make the project a regular subdivision (and subject to more requirements). They discussed whether municipal versus private utilities should be listed on the submitted plans and agreed applicants should provide a revised plan showing actual utility locations.

Next steps for applicants: Commissioners advised the applicants to engage an engineer to redraw the plan showing a compliant road alignment and cul-de-sac or turnaround meeting fire and city standards, obtain a preliminary engineering review (Johnson DeMille), and return to the commission. Staff offered to add an agenda item in the next meeting to revisit cul-de-sac length and other technical criteria.

Quote: Mark Newman, the applicant, described the property as "4 and a half acres" and asked whether the commission would accept a private driveway configuration; commissioners responded that the commission typically requires extending a roadway for multiple homes and that private-lane solutions for multi-lot subdivisions are unusual and require technical approval.