Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Large Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission recommends denial of Sand Hollow Mesa Neighborhood 6 preliminary plat over utilities and access concerns
Summary
The commission recommended the city council deny the 579-lot preliminary plat for Sand Hollow Mesa Neighborhood 6, citing inadequate electric, water and sewer infrastructure, missing easements and unresolved emergency access and substation funding.
Get email alerts on the Large Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Hurricane City Planning Commission on Oct. 9 recommended that the City Council deny the preliminary plat for Sand Hollow Mesa Neighborhood 6, a proposed 579-lot subdivision, citing insufficient public facilities and unresolved easement and funding issues.
Staff told the commission that the applicant's attorney rescinded a request for final action by the planning commission and asked that the city council act under terms of the Sand Hollow Mesa development agreement. Planning staff and joint-utility-committee (JUC) comments, however, identified major unresolved infrastructure items, including inadequate power delivery and needed substation work, incomplete water-model looping, road and emergency access not yet in place, and missing dedicated easements.
One commissioner summarized staff findings: "we simply just don't have the ability to service electric power or or sorry. Electric, water, sewer," and moved to recommend denial to the city council on those bases. Another staff speaker said the applicant has made efforts — including recorded easements in some places — but that significant additional right-of-way acquisitions and easements remain outstanding.
Commissioners discussed the effects of the development agreement, which freezes certain review roles to the 2021 rules the parties agreed would apply during buildout; they also flagged that granting preliminary plat approval without demonstrated service timelines and funding would leave the city exposed. The commission's recommendation was a denial to the city council based on the staff and JUC findings.
What happens next: The commission will forward its recommendation and findings to the City Council for final action under the development agreement; the applicant and staff may return with more complete engineering, easement dedication and financing plans.
