Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Priority Projects topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Castle Valley committee agrees to restore and split 2020 ingress/egress priority into discrete 2025 mitigation projects

Castle Valley Hazard Mitigation Committee · October 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee members agreed to reinstate the 2020 priority addressing ingress/egress roads (Greengate, Shafer, Castle Creek culvert) and to break the work into smaller mitigation projects with lead jurisdictions, timeframes and funding details to meet FEMA PRT requirements.

During the Oct. 8 Castle Valley Hazard Mitigation Committee meeting, members discussed reinstating Priority Project #2 from the 2020 plan — a multi-part item addressing ingress and egress routes, Greengate and Shafer roads, and repairs to the Castle Creek culvert — and breaking it into discrete mitigation projects for the 2025 update.

Committee members said the 2020 item was removed previously because it bundled too many tasks into one entry and felt unachievable. "If we don't have to complete it, I guess we might as well have it back," one member said, and others argued the project should be split into smaller, achievable projects. Members proposed adding separate 'boxes' in the plan for Greengate Road, Shafer Road and the Castle Creek culvert, with timeframes, funding sources and a named lead jurisdiction or department for each.

Why it matters: FEMA’s Plan Review Tool expects each identified hazard to be associated with a mitigation action. The committee resolved to ensure evacuation and access routes (which address fire and flooding hazards) are explicitly tied to mitigation actions to satisfy element C of the PRT. Members emphasized that improving evacuation routes and maintaining egress/ingress is both a mitigation and community-priority measure.

Discussion and next steps: The committee asked staff to create new project boxes with fields for lead jurisdiction, estimated timeframe and funding details and circulate them by email so members could contribute specifics. Pauline (staff) was asked to complete final formatting and page-numbering so the PRT can be properly cited. The group set a tentative in-person check on Nov. 12, 2025, to finalize entries and prepare the PRT for submission.

No formal vote to reinstate the item is recorded in the transcript; members discussed and reached informal consensus to restore and subdivide the project and to provide the additional details Kemp said FEMA requires.