Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sustainable Aviation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident urges aviation decarbonization; commission discusses UL100 fuel event but cites certification, tax and timing issues
Summary
A resident urged action on sustainable aviation fuel and electrifying ground equipment; staff said a planned UL100 distribution event could not meet FAA/state certification, segregation and tax requirements on short notice but may be possible in the fall with ~3 months' lead time.
Get email alerts on the Sustainable Aviation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Robert Owen, who identified himself as living at 1311 Middleton Street, urged the Middleton Airport Commission to pursue measures that could lower greenhouse gas emissions from aviation and airport operations, including encouraging FAA investigation of sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) produced from winter oilseeds, electrifying ground equipment like snowblowers and mowers, exploring biodiesel for snowplows, and adding charging infrastructure for electric aircraft visitors.
"I'm here to encourage some possible, proactive steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions," Owen said during public comment, and he suggested winter oil seeds — canola, camelina and pennycress — as locally grown feedstocks for renewable jet fuel.
Later in the meeting staff updated commissioners on a proposed UL100 (100‑octane unleaded) fuel distribution event proposed by a supplier (Vitol). Staff said the event could not proceed on the supplier's requested short timeline because of multiple regulatory and operational barriers: the UL100 product requires a supplemental type certificate (STC) for aircraft using it; dispensing equipment must be certified/inspected by state authorities; a fuel‑flow tax account (noted as 6¢ per gallon) would need to be established for the provider; and the airport must avoid mixing the product with existing fuel inventory unless all aircraft on the field hold the necessary STCs. Staff said about three months' lead time would likely be necessary to coordinate certification, tax accounting and logistics, and that a future fall event remains possible.
Staff described the technical and regulatory concerns as straightforward to resolve with adequate lead time and said the airport would continue discussions with the provider if both sides can meet certification and inspection requirements.
Next steps: staff will stay in contact with the provider and report back; commissioners signaled general interest pending resolution of regulatory and operational constraints.

