Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Flower Baskets Allocation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
PBIA board earmarks $20,000 for 2026 flower baskets, contingent on city match
Summary
The PBIA advisory board voted to allocate $20,000 of its funds toward 2026 flower-basket maintenance and ordering, contingent on matching support from the City of Olympia; members debated optics, contract administration with the ODA and contingency language about performance. Vote language passed at the Nov. 5 meeting.
The PBIA advisory board voted on Nov. 5 to allocate $20,000 toward flower-basket maintenance and ordering for 2026, but made the allocation contingent on the City of Olympia confirming a matching $20,000 in the city budget.
Staff told the board the city has a placeholder for $20,000 in the unapproved budget; extending a maintenance contract with the Olympia Downtown Alliance (ODA) would cover some maintenance and watering costs, while PBIA funds would fill the remaining gap. Staff explained the cost to order about 70 hanging baskets would be roughly $9,000 and that maintenance and watering are procured through a broader maintenance contract that also covers pressure washing and meter cleaning.
Board members split on the optics of spending limited PBIA funds while the city faces budget shortfalls. One member said the board risks appearing "to be blowing money on frivolous things" when basic social services are under strain; another argued that removing visible programs would confirm critics' view that the PBIA "doesn't do anything." The motion’s maker moved to approve $20,000 contingent on the city council’s allocation; Sophie Landis seconded and the motion carried.
Contract oversight questions remained. Several members said they want language requiring ODA to demonstrate dedicated maintenance staffing and to include performance remedies if service lapses occur. Staff said the contract’s scope currently includes flower-basket maintenance plus related maintenance services and that PBIA’s approval would not itself authorize the detailed contract terms — the board can require contingencies and return to contract specifics later.
Practical timeline notes: the grower needs order confirmations by early December; the city’s budget vote is scheduled for Dec. 9, after which the contingency will be resolved. The board directed staff to proceed with contingent funding (the approved motion earmarks $20,000 pending city match) and discussed forming an ad-hoc subcommittee to oversee implementation and future spending of the PBIA’s remaining balance (around $65,000 available for 2026).
