Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Golf Club Building topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Westborough rejects borrowing to advance golf‑club redevelopment study after split public testimony

Town of Westborough Special Town Meeting · October 22, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Voters defeated motions to borrow funds from the golf‑course retained earnings to study reuse of the historic Westborough Golf Club building. The initial $200,000 borrowing motion failed 122–228 and a reduced $50,000 amendment also failed, ending the article.

Town meeting on Oct. 21 rejected a proposal to borrow funds from the Westborough Golf Club enterprise retained earnings to pay for schematic design, a food‑service consultant and public engagement related to reuse of the golf‑club building. The municipal building committee recommended the feasibility work; the select board and municipal building committee framed the request as a way to determine whether a restaurant lease or other programmatic use could cover construction costs without a tax impact.

Opponents argued the enterprise fund is cyclical, that restaurants carry high business risk, and that the club’s existing pro shop functions adequately; some urged demolition and smaller‑scale work rather than a large redevelopment. Don Caprioli warned the project could become a ‘‘money pit’’ and criticized the original purchase price. Supporters said the $200,000 request was intended to be covered by the golf enterprise fund (greens fees, memberships) and to produce a clear pro forma and public engagement results before returning to town meeting.

Procedurally the meeting first voted on the $200,000 borrowing motion (122 in favor, 228 opposed). A later amendment to reduce the appropriation to $50,000 also failed (151 in favor, 186 opposed); because the higher‑dollar motion failed first, the article was defeated and no borrowing will occur.