Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission denies two subdivision variance requests, cites fire access and long-term maintenance
Summary
The commission denied variance requests for Ranches at Pinion Ridge Phase 7 and Great Basin Estates Phase 6, citing fire apparatus access, stormwater and paving standards and the need to avoid shifting maintenance burdens to the county.
The Duchesne County Commission denied two subdivision variance requests on Sept. 29, citing concerns about emergency vehicle access, stormwater permitting and the county’s long-term obligation to maintain roads.
County planning staff explained that the code (spec. 9-6-2) requires proposed subdivision streets in A-5 zones to be paved unless a variance is granted on findings including location, lot size, distance to existing paving and anticipated traffic flows. The planner told the commission that variances are permitted by the county commission under the code but warned the arrangement creates an appeal-authority ambiguity the office recommends clarifying in code updates.
Commissioners raised safety concerns about turning radii and whether the proposed 24-foot travel surface would accommodate fire apparatus. Staff noted the road length limit in the A-5 zone is 5,280 feet and the built road in question is approximately 5,148 feet (under the maximum) in one case and about 3,639 feet in another; stormwater permitting applies because proposed work exceeds one acre of disturbance. After discussion, Commissioner Kenyon moved to deny the variance for Ranches at Pinion Ridge Phase 7; the motion carried by roll call. Later the commission similarly voted to deny the variance for Great Basin Estates Phase 6.
The planner advised the applicants that options remain: comply with the paving requirements, appeal the commission’s decision through prescribed channels, or revise the subdivision as a minor subdivision with fewer lots. The commission’s denials leave the planning commission’s preliminary plat approvals intact; staff said applicants may return with revised plans that meet the county’s road and stormwater requirements.
The commission asked staff to review and reconcile conflicting language between the county’s subdivision ordinance and the recently adopted transportation master plan so future applicants and staff have clearer guidance.
