Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Revenue Forecast topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
New Mexico revenue forecast shows slowing growth; Moody’s upgrades state bond rating
Summary
Consensus revenue presenters told the House Appropriations & Finance Committee that recurring revenue growth has slowed and cited HR 1 and lower oil prices as headwinds, while the Department of Finance announced a Moody’s upgrade to several state bond ratings.
Lawmakers received a December consensus revenue update on Jan. 6, in which state revenue analysts reported that recurring revenue growth has moderated and that federal tax changes and lower oil prices are reducing future income and corporate tax receipts. "Total new money in FY '27 is estimated to be $105,700,000," Jennifer Fabian of the Legislative Finance Committee said during the presentation.
Wayne Probst of the Department of Finance and Administration highlighted both the narrower recurring outlook and a notable credit development: "On Friday, Moody’s Analytics announced that it is upgrading the state's bond rating ... the state general obligation bond rating is also being upgraded from AA2 to AA1," he said, adding the upgrades extend to transportation and other bond categories.
Why it matters: the panel said the state faces a mix of recurring downside pressure from personal and corporate income taxes — including behavior changes tied to the federal HR 1 budget reconciliation bill — and offsetting one‑time gains. Presenters flagged a $362.6 million, one‑time State Land Office lease sale gain coded as nonrecurring revenue and emphasized that investment earnings and reserve levels helped shield the general fund from oil‑price volatility.
Key details from the forecast included a downward revision to corporate income tax (SIT) receipts tied to weaker oil and gas expectations and taxpayer adjustments after federal tax changes; analysts described PIT declines in FY25 as intentional after recent state rate changes. Presenters also noted risks from missing federal data and potential further oil‑price weakness that could affect severance revenues.
What’s next: Members asked for more granular breakouts (for example, education versus health employment in the gross receipts base) and asked revenue agencies to supply historical spreadsheets. Officials said they would provide additional sector breakouts and stress‑test detail to committee members.
