Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Administrative Law Judicial Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee Adopts Amendment to Narrow Judicial Presumption in SB167, Sends Bill Forward
Summary
The committee adopted an amendment in SB167 that removes a presumption of agency correctness in judicial review (changing the de novo language), aligning state practice with U.S. Supreme Court precedent; members debated separation of powers before passing the bill.
The committee considered an amendment to SB167 that modifies judicial-review language in the Alabama Administrative Procedure Act. The amendment changes the phrase "de novo" to read "without any presumption as to its correctness," removing the presumptive deference agencies previously enjoyed in judicial review.
Chair explained the amendment narrows de novo review so a court would not treat the agency’s decision as presumptively correct; he said this aligns state law with U.S. Supreme Court precedent. Senators debated whether the change would limit judicial activism or alter separation-of-powers boundaries; proponents argued it merely restores judicial discretion to fully consider evidence without an agency presumption.
The amendment was adopted without objection on previous role and the bill received a favorable report after a long roll call. The committee characterized the change as conforming state law to recent federal decisions and discussed potential unintended consequences of altering longstanding administrative protections.
Further implementation, case-law effects and administrative consequences will play out in future litigation and rulemaking.
