Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Sanitation Fee topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Fredericksburg staff proposes $10 monthly fee to cover brush and leaf pickup; council debates amount

Fredericksburg City · November 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City sanitation staff proposed a new fee on utility bills to cover brush and leaf pickup (estimated at about $10 per month per household if applied to all 5,900 accounts), prompting council debate over affordability, opt‑outs, and program design. Staff will return proposed ordinance language in December with an intended effective date of Jan. 1, 2026.

City sanitation staff presented council with a plan to begin charging utility customers for brush and leaf pickup, estimating that charging all 5,900 residential solid‑waste accounts would cover labor and equipment costs and produce roughly $530,000 in general‑fund revenue if collection begins Jan. 1, 2026.

Chris, a sanitation department staff member, said the department factors roughly “2 and a half employees” into the brush‑pickup service and that combined labor and equipment produced an annual cost that translated to “just under $8 per month for a customer” for brush alone. When staff calculated both brush and leaf collection together, they said the figure arrived at about $10 per month per customer.

The proposal is to amend the ordinance and add a fee schedule to the municipal code so the charge appears on utility bills. Staff told council it would bring ordinance language back for consideration at an upcoming December meeting (possible dates discussed included Dec. 2, Dec. 3 or Dec. 16) with an effective date of Jan. 1, 2026 if approved.

Council members exchanged views on cost‑recovery versus affordability. One councilmember said $10 would be too large a burden and suggested a $5 charge for households that would be materially affected; another cautioned that charging less than current cost risks persistent shortfalls. Council raised practical questions about multifamily properties and opt‑outs: staff indicated the current per‑customer formula assumes all solid‑waste accounts are charged and that multifamily units and apartment customers would need special treatment because some do not receive curbside collection.

Council also pressed staff on longer‑term implications. Staff noted sanitation rates were recently increased as part of the FY26 budget (the first increase in about 10 years) and suggested municipal utility‑rate reviews could occur on a three‑to‑five‑year cadence. Staff added that a pending federal grant to build a transfer station could enable curbside recycling in the future and change the long‑term cost picture.

Several councilmembers recommended broader thinking before finalizing any fee: one urged packaging brush, leaf, bulk pickup and recycling into a single sanitation strategy so residents see clear value; another urged a resident survey and sensitivity to younger families for whom $10 a month may be meaningful.

Staff will return with draft ordinance language and a fee schedule in December; no vote was taken at the special meeting and no final action was adopted.