Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents and city seek broader study of drainage, traffic tied to Holmig Lane development
Summary
City staff reported ongoing meetings with landowners and the developer about stormwater runoff, erosion and traffic tied to the Holmig Lane subdivision; staff and residents agreed to a site visit and further structured meetings to verify discharge rates and consider green‑infrastructure solutions.
City staff updated the Fredericksburg City Council Tuesday on continuing concerns about drainage and traffic stemming from the Holmig Lane subdivision and described outreach efforts with residents, engineers and county officials.
The city manager said he had met with about 20 landowners and with county representation; he described two and a half hour community meetings and follow-ups with the developer’s engineer, SEH Engineering, to verify stormwater design and discharge rates. “The two biggest issues are drainage and the traffic,” the manager said, summarizing residents’ concerns.
City staff said the subdivision’s construction appears to concentrate flow into an open channel that discharges at a single downstream point, changing how runoff reaches neighbors. Staff reported seeking engineers’ verification that the subdivision performs to its original design standards (predevelopment flow versus post‑development flow rates) and said it had asked for calculations to confirm whether constructed features meet design expectations.
Residents urged a broader, regional approach to mass drainage analysis rather than piecemeal fixes. A speaker representing neighbors said a mass drainage downstream impact analysis should be coordinated between city and county, and recommended hydrogeological study and careful community engagement before annexation or interim fixes.
Staff scheduled a site visit for Nov. 10 at 10 a.m. (meeting at the Sonoma Oaks sales office) to inspect drainage from a nearby apartment complex and the downstream concrete ditch; Marissa Bruno of Hill Country Alliance was listed to attend and to discuss potential green‑infrastructure options. Staff indicated it will continue facilitated meetings between residents and the developer, and planned to return to council with an update at a Nov. 18 special meeting; the manager said this item could come back to council again in December.
No formal enforcement action or council vote was recorded during the update; staff said additional technical information is expected from engineers and the city will coordinate further with the county.
