Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Child Welfare topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Subcommittee clarifies relief‑of‑custody statute to include non‑parent custodians and require cooperation with social services

House Courts of Justice Civil Law Subcommittee · January 27, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Bill 73 would add 'other custodian' to relief‑of‑custody statutes and require petitioners to cooperate with local departments of social services; the measure—rooted in recommendations from the Virginia Commission on Youth—was reported unanimously (10–0).

Delegate Cole said HB 73 is a technical clarification resulting from a two‑year study by the Commission on Youth and a work group of judges and stakeholders. The bill would add the phrase "other custodian" after "parent" in the relief‑of‑custody statute and require any petitioner to cooperate with the local department of social services during the initial investigation.

Cole said the change aligns the jurisdictional statute with current practice in juvenile and domestic relations courts, where non‑parent custodians (for example, grandparents with custody) already petition for relief of custody. Will Egan of the Virginia Commission on Youth, available online, told the committee the bill "aligns what practically happens with what the code should say." Committee members asked whether the bill affects termination of parental rights; court staff confirmed that the bill does not change statutes that govern termination.

After discussion and public testimony—during which the Supreme Court’s Executive Secretary observed the bill does not change the availability of termination of parental rights—the subcommittee voted to report HB 73 to the full committee by a voice vote recorded as 10–0.