Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Coalition Mou topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board reviews draft small‑GSA coalition MOU and Prop 4 funding scenarios

Hawaii Groundwater Management Agency, Hawaii Basin Groundwater Management Agency · November 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff presented a draft memorandum of understanding to continue participation in a small‑GSA coalition that would fund lobbyist services; board discussed costs (initial six‑month budget $30,000; worst‑case agency share $6,000) and requested clearer performance metrics and worst/best case financial scenarios before a December decision.

Staff said Sonoma County Water Agencys funding for the small‑GSA coalition will expire at yearend and a draft memorandum of understanding (MOU) was circulated for agencies choosing to continue participation and share lobbying costs. "There's a draft memorandum of understanding there and a scope of work," staff said, describing deliverables such as legislative updates, fact sheets and monthly calls with the lobbyist.

The proposed initial budget for the first six months was described as $30,000, with agency shares ranging from $4,500 to $6,000 depending on participation. Staff said that if only five agencies join, the worst case would be a $6,000 commitment for the first six months (about $1,000 per month). Board members raised concerns about the mismatch between a calendar‑year contract and their fiscal year, the timing of prorating, and the lack of defined performance standards.

Directors asked for clearer scenarios showing best and worst case financial outcomes if agencies drop out and requested performance milestones or timelines from the lobbyist. One director said the coalitions work should show tangible results within six months. Staff agreed to bring a revised MOU with cost scenarios and additional detail to the December 11 meeting for a formal decision.

No binding financial commitment was approved at this meeting; the item remains for action at the December meeting.