Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Intermunicipal Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Applicants say county review won’t change barn-restoration plans; board notes GML §239 referral
Summary
Bart and Michelle Dorsey sought county review for renovating a barn at 880 Bridge Street to host events. The county explained the referral triggers General Municipal Law §239 review because the property straddles a town boundary; staff found no countywide impact and deferred to local consideration.
Bart and Michelle Dorsey addressed the Albany County Planning Board about plans to renovate a barn at 880 Bridge Street for event use and expressed frustration about repeated local reviews and delays.
Planning staff explained that because the property lies within 500 feet of the Town of Bethlehem boundary the project triggers intermunicipal review under New York General Municipal Law §239. Staff told the applicants the county’s role is limited to checking for countywide impacts and recommended deferral to the local board after finding none.
The applicants said they own the full parcel on both sides of the town line and that the town of Bethlehem has generally been supportive; they questioned whether the county review would materially change the local outcome. Applicants also said they had considered hiring outside counsel if the town were to deny the project and asked about next steps in that scenario. Board members and staff reiterated that the referral is procedural and does not supersede local permitting decisions.
Decision: The county treated the matter as a referral with staff recommending deferral to local consideration under GML §239. The board’s discussion emphasized process clarity — county referral does not equate to county approval — and advised applicants to continue local permitting steps.
