Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hyde Park council considers Waste Management extension tied to CPI; public hearing on fees planned
Summary
Council discussed a proposed five-year extension with Waste Management and a CPI-based rate change (staff cited ~5.41%); staff said a public hearing on any fee change will be held before rates take effect and the administration requested authority for the mayor to sign an agreement once the fee schedule is adopted.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Hyde Park City Council on Oct. 22 discussed a proposed five-year contract extension with Waste Management as part of a multi-city consortium, and staff warned that federal CPI terms in the contract would drive an increase in collection fees.
Marcus, a city staff member, told council that the contractor reported schedule changes and that the contract’s pricing includes an annual CPI adjustment. "The date for asphalt is Friday... The contract does allow for the city, if we can prove that there's damages that the city is sustaining by going over schedule," Marcus said when explaining remedies and schedule concerns; he also noted the CPI figure staff had identified at about 5.41 percent.
Staff asked the council to authorize the mayor to sign the extension once the fee schedule is finalized and after the required public hearing. Marcus said the city must hold a public hearing on the proposed fee changes in November before any new fees take effect in December, and that neighboring consortium cities plan to update resident rates to match the consortium charges.
Councilors raised customer service concerns and the inability of residents to reach Waste Management by hotline, prompting staff to say the city will continue to press the company on responsiveness and use the consortium contract vehicle to seek better service and potential remedies. One councilor noted Waste Management’s local sponsorship and community involvement while urging improved responsiveness.
The transcript includes a motion to authorize the mayor to sign the agreement, but the provided segments do not capture a recorded final vote. Staff listed next steps as preparing the fee calculation, scheduling the public hearing, and returning to council with the rate recommendation.
Next steps: staff to provide an explicit fee impact calculation and to place a public hearing on the Nov. council agenda; any fee change would be adopted after public hearing and would take effect as allowed under the contract timeline.
