Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Procedure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Dardenne Prairie postpones second reading of municipal code change after vote‑count issue

City of Dardenne Prairie Board of Aldermen · March 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board withdrew an on‑the‑spot declaration of passage for a municipal code amendment after legal advice that five aldermen were required for a same‑night second reading; members voted to postpone the second reading to the next meeting.

The Dardenne Prairie Board of Aldermen withdrew an immediate declaration of passage and postponed the second reading of a municipal code amendment after the board discovered it did not meet the vote threshold required for a same‑night second reading.

What happened: Bill 2510 proposed a change to municipal code section 110.195 (procedures for introduction of bills). The bill was introduced and read by title. The presiding official initially announced a declaration but, after consulting legal counsel, said the ordinance required five aldermen votes to be read a second time on the same night it was introduced.

Legal clarification and immediate correction: A board member summarized the legal advice, saying that for this meeting five votes were necessary to hold a second reading the same night; because the board did not have five affirmative votes the presiding official withdrew the earlier declaration. A motion to postpone the second reading to the next meeting carried by voice vote.

Why it matters: The exchange demonstrates the board correcting its own procedure mid‑meeting after legal counsel clarified the rule for same‑night second readings. The postponement means the code amendment will return for a formal second reading when the board can satisfy the required vote threshold.

Next steps: The second reading of Bill 2510 was scheduled for the next meeting (one week later, per discussion); the transcript records the postponement motion and an agreement to revisit the item when a full board is available.