Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Recreation Center topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Study: community recreation center would likely need dedicated funding; capital estimate $8.5–15M

Dardenne Prairie Board of Aldermen · August 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City administrator presented a feasibility analysis for building a community recreation center on a 10‑acre city parcel, estimating capital costs of roughly $8.5–15 million (without pools/ice) and annual operating costs of about $500,000–$1.5 million; recommendation was to identify a reliable funding source rather than rely on general fund.

City Administrator Kathy presented a financial analysis of potential uses for a city‑owned 10‑acre parcel, focusing on the feasibility of a community recreation center. She said the analysis was created using an AI‑assisted research process and cross‑checked on a second AI platform, and that she also drew on 34 years of professional experience.

Kathy reported typical national subsidy rates for community rec centers are between 65 and 75 percent; Missouri cities tend to mirror that trend. For a general recreation center that excludes high‑cost features such as ice sheets or pools, she estimated capital costs in the $8.5 million to $15 million range and annual operating costs of roughly $500,000 to $1.5 million, with labor being the largest ongoing expense.

Kathy noted the city’s parks and stormwater half‑cent sales tax generates about $750,000 annually but that approximately $250,000 is committed to debt service and the remainder mostly funds current parks and stormwater operating expenses, leaving limited capacity to support a new center without another dedicated funding source.

Her recommendation was that if the board wants to pursue a rec center further, it should first establish a reliable funding mechanism rather than rely on the general fund. The work session included no binding decision to proceed; the board may consider options and funding sources in future agenda items.