Wellsville begins 60-day review after packed hearing on South Cache Valley recreation district

Wellsville City held a public hearing Jan. 7 to gather resident input on whether the city should participate in a proposed South Cache Valley Recreation Special Service District, starting a statutorily required 60-day protest period but making no binding decision.

Scott (city staff) told the council the resolution under consideration simply begins a public process and that forming a district would not, by itself, authorize taxes or fees. "We are moving down that road. That doesn't putting on the ballot is up to the voters to determine," Scott said, summarizing the steps that would follow public input. Eric Johnson, the municipal attorney brought in to explain the district process, told residents the board makeup and funding would be determined later and that the district would need a subsequent election to approve any tax or bond financing.

The hearing drew a large turnout and sharply divided testimony. Many speakers said they oppose using property taxes to finance a rec center. "I am against using property tax money to pay for it," Kelly Nelson told the council, echoing other comments about the burden on people on fixed incomes. Residents raised concerns about uncertain costs, long-term operating deficits and whether Wellsville taxpayers would subsidize facilities located in other communities.

Other speakers argued Wellsville should take a seat at the table to influence scope, access and cost-sharing. Chad Wright, identified as a Nibley City resident and participant in outreach, and the study facilitator urged representation. The facilitator said recreation centers can deliver broad community and public-health benefits and that elected officials often serve on district boards to ensure representation.

Councilmembers and staff repeatedly emphasized that tonight's action only begins a 60-day period for written protests and input. Eric Johnson confirmed that the statute requires that period before the council can make a final decision. The council will collect written protests and additional comments and return to the question after the 60 days have elapsed.

The council did not vote to join a district; instead it opened the formal public-input window required by statute and asked residents to submit written protests or support during the 60-day period. The council encouraged both sides to do outreach and said residents will ultimately vote on any bond or tax proposals if and when they are placed on a ballot.