Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Agricultural Protection Area topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission recommends denying Agricultural Protection Area for Freeze Creek parcel
Summary
The Emigration Canyon Planning Commission unanimously recommended denial of Ryan Leek’s Agricultural Protection Area application for a 1475 North Pine Crest Canyon Road parcel, finding it does not meet the five statutory criteria because it lacks current commercial agricultural use, viable access and sufficient evidence of profitability or farm improvements.
Get email alerts on the Agricultural Protection Area topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Emigration Canyon Planning Commission on Oct. 9 unanimously recommended that the City Council deny an application by Ryan Leek for designation of a 40‑acre parcel at 1475 North Pine Crest Canyon Road as an Agricultural Protection Area (APA).
The commission concluded Leek’s application (OAM2025‑001470) failed to satisfy the five criteria in Utah’s Agricultural Protection Act after staff review, the applicant’s presentation and extensive public comment. Commissioner Jim Karkut moved to recommend denial, citing statutory language and the commission’s deliberations; the motion carried unanimously.
Leek told the commission the parcel is intended as an experimental agroforestry and conservation project that would pair conservation practices with limited productive uses such as beekeeping and maple sap research. “When I first proposed the APA, I had no idea what was gonna be this controversial,” he said, and described USDA‑NRCS conservation funding, beekeeping trials and fuel‑reduction efforts aimed at reducing wildfire risk.
Residents and neighborhood representatives pushed back. Herman Post, speaking for the Immigration Oaks Homeowners Association, said the parcel is landlocked and that profitability and existing farm improvements were not demonstrable: “Mister Leek has no road access to his land. He currently must hike over three miles on rugged trail to access his land,” Post said, and urged denial because a profitable agricultural enterprise is unlikely without resolved access.
Commissioners reviewed the five statutory criteria individually. They found no clear record of ongoing commercial agricultural production on the parcel, noted steep, ravine‑like terrain and limited on‑site infrastructure, questioned the economic viability of helicoptering supplies or otherwise servicing the site, flagged wildfire‑suppression and emergency‑access concerns, and concluded proposed structures and small hobbyist activities do not rise to the level of documented farm improvements the statute contemplates. Staff and a commissioner with water‑rights experience noted Leek holds six historic stock‑watering rights that total just under two acre‑feet but said those rights are for stock watering and not presently authorized for irrigation without separate change approvals.
Because the APA designation is a legislative action by the City Council, the Planning Commission’s recommendation will be transmitted to the Council for final action. The commission’s record notes extensive public input (commission staff reported receiving 255 pages of public comment) and identified unresolved issues for council consideration, including access litigation, water‑use limitations and wildfire protection measures.
Next steps: The commission’s recommendation and the application record will be forwarded to the Emigration Canyon City Council for its review and final decision. The applicant and members of the public may present further arguments at that stage.
