Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hurricane planning commission tables 15-acre zone change over power-infrastructure questions
Summary
The commission tabled a zone-change request for roughly 15 acres at 3390 S. 1100 W. after the developer asked for more time to resolve how 400-amp power allocations purchased earlier would be used and whether lots should be restricted to 200-amp service. The tabled motion passed by voice vote.
HURRICANE — The Hurricane City Planning Commission on Jan. 8 tabled a proposed zone change for about 15 acres at 3390 South 1100 West after the developer and commissioners raised unresolved questions about electrical service and other infrastructure.
Eric Richardson of Richardson Brothers Custom Homes and Dap Hillman LLC told the panel he and partner developers had participated in a city-facilitated project to route power south and had previously purchased 400-amp service capacity for lots in the adjacent Hurricane Cliffs subdivision. Richardson asked the commission to delay action on ZC25-23 so the applicants and city staff could explore whether the 400-amp allocations could be reallocated or split to serve the new phase and to confirm how that would be recorded and enforced.
“...we participated with the consortium of developers to get power; we bought 400-amp services for those lots,” Richardson said, asking that the item be tabled until contractual questions could be clarified.
Commissioners and planning staff explained the underlying concern: the city and power department designed Phase 1 and 2 infrastructure anticipating lots larger than one-third acre could require 400-amp services, and infrastructure sizing and transformer placement were built to that assumption. One commissioner warned that changing allocations now could leave the city or later property owners without adequate infrastructure unless restrictions are recorded on plats or through development agreements.
City staff and engineering raised alternatives discussed during the hearing: honor existing 400-amp allocations until a future substation or expanded capacity is available; record plat restrictions limiting future meter sizes; or negotiate an amendment to the power agreement and record enforceable restrictions for future owners.
After discussion, a commissioner moved to table ZC25-23 at the applicants’ request “until we clarify some issues regarding power.” The motion was seconded and carried on a voice vote.
The item will return to the commission after the applicant and staff coordinate with the power department and finalize the approach to meter sizing and any recorded restrictions or development-agreement language.
