Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
USC researcher Peter H. Kim on why integrity breaches are hardest to repair
Summary
In a Federal Judicial Center podcast interview, Dr. Peter H. Kim explains that people weigh competence and integrity differently: competence lapses are often forgiven, while integrity violations stick. He discusses why apologies can backfire and offers reframing and impartial corroboration as repair strategies.
Dr. Peter H. Kim, a professor of management and organization at the University of Southern California's Marshall School of Business, told host Laurie Murphy that trust depends not only on behavior but on how people perceive competence, integrity and power. "A widespread definition of trust in my field is a willingness to make oneself vulnerable to another based on positive expectations in situations involving risk," he said.
Kim said social cues and prior perceptions often outweigh objective facts when people judge trustworthiness. He explained that competence information tends to produce a "positive bias" (one strong success can outweigh later failures), whereas integrity violations carry a "negative bias," making them persistently diagnostic. "If you are caught embezzling once and you don't embezzle…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

