Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Mob City Rides opposes new golf-cart operator; supporters say competition will create jobs

Mobile City Council · January 27, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a public hearing on Zed LLC's application to operate a golf-cart service, Mob City Rides' owners said the market cannot sustain a second operator and that they moved about 25,000 riders in 2025; others argued competition creates jobs. Council did not make a final decision at the hearing.

The council opened a public hearing on Zed LLC’s application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity to operate a golf-cart transportation service.

Austin Saint Clair, who identified himself and his wife Denise as owners of Mob City Rides, asked the council not to approve Zed LLC’s application, saying there is not enough business in Mobile for two similar companies. Saint Clair told the council Mob City Rides moved about 25,000 riders in 2025 and that roughly 30% of their business occurs during Mardi Gras. He said weekday demand is low, that they pay drivers by rides and sometimes guarantee a flat rate when a driver logs too few trips, and that some carts sit unused outside of peak events.

Jim Walker, speaking in favor of competition, said he plans to employ people who have difficulty finding work and argued that competition helps the market. Council members asked clarifying questions about employment practices and whether the Saint Clairs intended to hire people with criminal records; Walker said he would perform background checks and hire those he could insure and employ.

Council did not announce a decision on Zed LLC’s certificate during the public hearing; the item was heard and closed for public comment.

Speakers urged the council to weigh potential economic opportunity against the risk to an existing local operator and requested any decision reflect public-safety and employment considerations.