Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Local Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Trustees direct clerk to clarify petition intent for District 12 ditch cleanout; further action tabled

Supervisors acting as trustees for Drainage District Number 12, Webster 38 Calhoun · January 27, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Trustees for Joint Drainage District 12 (Webster 38 Calhoun) voted to have the Webster County drainage clerk contact the petitioner to clarify whether the request is for a cleanout/repair or a costly improvement, then tabled final decisions until their next meeting in two weeks.

Trustees for Drainage District Number 12 (Webster 38 Calhoun) accepted a petition for a ditch cleanout/reclassification and voted to direct the Webster County drainage clerk to contact the petitioner to clarify whether the action sought is a clean out/repair or an improvement.

The distinction matters because a repair generally triggers a "you shall" obligation to fix unsafe or failing drainage features and produces a different assessment process than an improvement, which can carry much larger costs and allow remonstrance by landowners. Supervisor Vicky Conrad moved to direct the clerk to seek clarification; Scott Jacobs seconded the motion and it passed on a voice vote.

Trustees debated the options at length before the vote. John Cochran initially moved to accept and place the petition on file but withdrew that motion to allow clearer wording. Calhoun County drainage engineer Brian Bloom advised the board that the engineer they appoint would, at minimum, prepare a letter report describing recommended repairs or improvements. Bloom said that if the engineer recommends repair, the board "has to move forward" to address the problem; if the engineer recommends an improvement, landowners have the right of remonstrance.

Local landowner Dan Hansen, who identified himself as a resident of Rowland Township, told trustees he and other residents were "very uneducated about what goes forward from here" and worried that tenants and landowners could be responsible for study and mapping costs. Hansen asked how many more opportunities for public input there would be; trustees replied that accepting and placing a petition on file is an administrative step and that subsequent steps (engineer report, potential remonstrance) afford additional opportunities for notice and comment.

After directing the clerk to clarify the petitioner's intent, trustees voted to table further action on the joint drainage item until the next meeting in two weeks.

Motions recorded in the meeting: the appointment of the chair (motion by Bob Thode, second by David George; motion carried), the directive for the Webster County drainage clerk to contact the petitioner for clarification (motion by Supervisor Conrad, second by Supervisor Jacobs; motion carried), and a motion by Supervisor Thode to table the joint drainage item for two weeks (seconded and passed).