Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Riverside supervisors initiate review of three Cherry Valley general-plan changes amid strong resident opposition
Summary
The Riverside County Board of Supervisors voted to initiate foundation-component general plan amendments that would allow minimum half‑acre lots and limited commercial in parts of Cherry Valley, prompting residents to warn of septic, water and character impacts and urging preservation of the existing one‑acre standard.
The Riverside County Board of Supervisors on Jan. 6 initiated consideration of three foundation‑component general plan amendments (FGPAs) that would change land-use designations in the Cherry Valley policy area to permit low‑density residential parcels with a half‑acre minimum and small local commercial corners, county planners told the board.
The board opened an extended public hearing that drew dozens of Cherry Valley residents, community‑group representatives and the applicants. Mary Daniel, a resident and frequent commenter, told supervisors the general plan exists to provide certainty and protect the rural lifestyle of longstanding unincorporated communities: "Please hold to the 1 acre per house requirement and deny this amendment," she said.
Developers represented by Travis Heaps of West Coast Entitlement and Steven Nieto of the Altum Group presented a consolidated approach covering three separate proposals. Heaps said the applicants retooled original proposals after community feedback and emphasized a unified plan with a half‑acre minimum, local commercial corners and a requirement that each applicant submit their implementing project within six months if the board initiates the FGPA.
Residents repeatedly raised concerns about groundwater and septic systems, arguing the area’s septic‑dependent infrastructure informed the county’s existing one‑acre policy. Callie Atencio, who lives across from one of the sites, said: "No one in Cherry Valley wants to change the general plan to half‑acre parcels. … Tract homes were not meant for Cherry Valley." Other speakers urged larger lots, phased lot‑size transitions toward the existing one‑acre parcels, and binding community benefits tied to infrastructure improvements.
Planning staff and applicants acknowledged outstanding technical work. An Altum Group planner said the project would require CEQA review, utility and wastewater studies and community outreach; if septic is infeasible the developers said they will evaluate unified package treatment plants or sewer connections. County planning staff emphasized initiation is not approval of a final project: initiation allows applicants six months to prepare a formal application and technical studies, or the initiation will lapse.
Supervisors noted the tension between property‑owner rights, county housing needs and local character. One supervisor recommended larger lots adjacent to existing one‑acre properties and said community benefits should be developed through public engagement. The board recorded a vote to initiate the FGPA(s) (recorded in the transcript as passing 4‑0); staff said the applicants must return within six months with technical documentation and a project application.
What happens next Applicants must submit a full project application and technical studies (water/wastewater, traffic, biological) within the six‑month initiation window. The board’s initiation does not permit construction; subsequent entitlements, CEQA review and potential conditions or community‑benefit agreements will be determined in later hearings.
Speakers quoted in this article spoke at the public hearing; quotes are drawn from the meeting transcript.
