Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Drainage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board adopts multiple ditch viewers' reports and accepts CD 35 work; petitions adjust acres and fees
Summary
Drainage authority hearings resulted in adoption of viewers' reports and approvals of petitions to remove, add and outlet acreage among County Ditches 74, 35, 16 and 57. Viewers recommended acreage-based outlet fees and benefit adjustments; board approved the findings and orders.
The Blue Earth County drainage authority held multiple continuation and final hearings July 8, adopting viewers' reports and approving petitions that move acreage among County Ditches 74, 35, 16 and 57.
County Drain 74: appointed viewer Mark Behrens reported maps showing portions of the Groenwald and Czarne properties are tiled out of the CD 74 watershed and recommended a substantial reduction of benefits on those acres. "The Czarne property had 8.1 acres within the watershed... I reduced the benefits on the Czarne property, dropped dollars 13,778," Behrens said, and he said he reduced the Groenwald property's benefits by about $4,000. After no public comment, the board moved to accept the findings and adopt the viewers' report; the motion carried.
County Ditch 35 acceptance: ISG engineer Chuck Bridal presented the final acceptance report for a two‑package improvement project that included installation of a 60‑inch pipe to address erosion and tile replacement work. Bridal said the pipe was televised with no issues and that tile portions carry a three‑year warranty while open‑ditch work carries a one‑year warranty. He recommended accepting the work and releasing final payments to contractors; the board approved the engineer's acceptance and final payments.
Interconnected petitions (CD 16, CD 35, CD 57): Engineers and the appointed viewer presented hydraulic analyses and benefit/outlet‑fee recommendations for several related petitions that transfer small acreages among ditches. ISG's hydraulic analyses concluded the acreage swaps (for example, roughly 5.1–5.62 acres moving between CD 35 and CD 16 and about 31.75 acres between CD 57 and CD 35) would have negligible or manageable hydraulic impacts and would not increase overtopping frequency at downstream crossings. Viewer recommendations included outlet/buy‑in fees and benefit calculations: for CD 16 an outlet fee of $100/acre for about 5.1 acres (about $510) and benefits added at roughly $2,700/acre were proposed; for a planned buy‑in into CD 35 one viewer proposed a $1,900/acre buy‑in for ~31.75 acres, producing a one‑time buy‑in estimate listed on the team's spreadsheet. Following the presentations and with no public comment, the board moved and approved adoption of the drafted findings and orders in each petition hearing.
Why it matters: the actions adjust who pays for repair and maintenance, change benefit assessments for affected parcels, and set one‑time outlet fees that can be significant for affected landowners. The files and spreadsheets presented (maps, itemized benefits and damage calculations, and recommended fee tables) remain part of the record.
What happened next: motions accepting viewers' reports, adopting findings and orders, and approving the engineer's acceptance report for CD 35 were all approved by voice vote during the meeting. Specific follow‑up actions include updating the benefit/damage ledgers and implementing the outlet fees and benefit changes per the viewers' spreadsheets.
