Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Abatement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Finance committee pauses vote on $10,976 abatement request for Rhode Island Business Development Institute
Summary
Committee members asked staff to confirm which legal entity and documentation correspond to a requested $10,976.28 abatement for property at 220 Smith Street; the administration cautioned that abatements are rare and the committee voted to continue the matter for further diligence.
The Providence City Finance Committee on Jan. 27 deferred action on a resolution seeking abatement of $10,976.28 in property taxes for the Rhode Island Business Development Institute (listed at 220 Smith Street) after members raised questions about which legal entity is the appropriate beneficiary.
Aaron Eastergartner, deputy chief of staff to the council, told the committee the resolution requests abatement for tax year 2025 and that a state bill regarding the institute had passed but was prospective rather than retroactive. “The total amount is for $10,976.28,” Eastergartner said when introducing the resolution.
Committee members pressed for clarity about the applicant. Council members and administration staff reported that two filings (separate Forms 990) and two different names appeared in Secretary of State records: the Rhode Island Business Development Institute and the Rhode Island Black Business Association (RIBBA), which had overlapping leadership but different federal IDs and potentially different tax classifications (one 501(c)(3), the other a 501(c)(6)). CFO Lawrence Mancini advised caution, noting that abatements are legally sensitive and that the assessor must prepare an exact instrument tied to the entity of record.
Council members said representatives from the institution were not present (members cited a recent storm and short notice) and asked whether the abatement amount had already been paid; staff said their understanding was it had not.
Given the uncertainty, Vice Chair Jim Taylor moved to continue the matter so staff, the assessor and council representatives can confirm the correct entity name, address, federal filings and other supporting documents before taking a vote. The committee voted to continue the request and asked staff to return with clarified documents for the next finance meeting and to ensure the item can be placed on the subsequent full council agenda.
The committee emphasized it was not questioning the organization’s work but said public‑meeting diligence is required before the council forgives any certified tax liability.
