Alameda County supervisors approve $269 million Santa Rita Jail repairs after heated public opposition
Loading...
Summary
After hours of public comment opposing a proposed $269 million capital package for Santa Rita Jail, the Alameda County Board of Supervisors approved item 55.1 to fund life‑safety and deferred maintenance work. The vote was 4–1; concerns about timing, budget trade‑offs and the county’s CareFirst/JailsLast priorities persisted.
The Alameda County Board of Supervisors voted 4–1 on June 3 to approve a multi‑year capital project for Santa Rita Jail intended to address life‑safety and deferred‑maintenance needs, despite extensive public opposition that urged the board to prioritize housing and community‑based care.
Supervisor Nate Miley moved the motion to approve item 55.1 (recommendations A–J), saying the measure “is not an expansion of the jail. This is basically making sure that we address the deferred maintenance that's occurring right now in the jail,” and arguing the work addresses immediate safety risks. Supervisor Marquez seconded the motion. In the roll call, Supervisors Marquez, Miley, President Halbert and Vice President Tam voted yes. Supervisor Fortunato Bass voted no.
The General Services Agency’s director, Kimberly Gassaway, told the board the project packages critical replacements and repairs — including fire/life‑safety systems, aging generators, HVAC failures and an emergency ring road — that have reached or exceeded typical service life in a 39‑year‑old facility. Gassaway said an earlier 2018 assessment and subsequent site inspections identified recurring system failures and that bundling the work into a single design‑build contract produced economies of scale. She added that contractor bids are time‑limited and that deferral risks higher costs and operational disruptions.
The vote followed more than two hours of public comment focused on the project’s size, timing and the county’s stated CareFirst/JailsLast policy. Residents, advocates and organizers urged the board to pause or reject the allocation and to redirect capital funds to housing, mental‑health care and diversion programs. “Allocating $269,000,000 towards jail construction while residents continue scraping to get by would be a shameful display of public leadership,” said Restore Oakland organizer Natalia Bommani during public comment. Another speaker, David Stern of Albany, said he was “shocked” to learn of what he called a last‑minute quarter‑billion‑dollar proposal.
Supporters of the project, including supervisors who voted yes, emphasized that the board is not approving jail expansion but addressing critical life‑safety failures that affect staff and incarcerated people. Board members also acknowledged the county’s policy goal to reduce incarceration and pledged to continue implementing CareFirst/JailsLast strategies while maintaining current safety standards.
Board members pressed staff for additional budget detail and for greater transparency and public vetting of future capital requests. The County Administrator said funding would come from the board’s long‑range capital financing plan adopted in 2023. Director Gassaway noted bids are valid only through July 2 and that delaying the action could complicate final negotiations and pricing.
The board’s action authorizes the General Services Agency to move forward with the recommended contract approach and funding plan for the listed scope items. The motion carried and the board proceeded to other agenda matters.
What’s next: staff said they can bring additional line‑item details and updates to board work sessions if requested; the project is structured as a multi‑year implementation with funding drawn as expenses occur.
