Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ethical Investment Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board sets Oct. 3 special meeting to consider ethical investment policy after months of public pressure

Alameda County Board of Supervisors · September 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Following repeated public requests to agendize an ethical investment policy, the board confirmed a special meeting date of Oct. 3 to consider the proposed policy and hear stakeholders; speakers urged immediate divestment steps tied to alleged human-rights concerns while others warned of potential portfolio impacts.

After more than an hour of public comment urging immediate action, Alameda County supervisors announced a special meeting on Oct. 3 to consider an ethical investment policy requested by community groups and the treasurer.

Throughout the public-comment period speakers from multiple organizations pressed the board to adopt a policy that would screen county investments for ties to companies implicated in alleged human-rights violations. Speakers said county investments should reflect community values and urged divestment from firms they tied to actions in Gaza; other speakers cautioned that screening could reduce returns on the county’s roughly $11.2 billion fund and lessen available services.

President Halbert told speakers that staff and leadership had coordinated with the treasurer and that Oct. 3 was the preferred date for a special meeting to hear the ethical investment policy. The board and staff signaled that the treasurer (texted during the meeting) had indicated availability for that date and that the item will be placed on a special September/October agenda.

Treasurer and staff had earlier engaged with advocates on a draft policy; county staff asked speakers to monitor the board’s public calendar for final agenda posting. The board did not take a final vote on Sept. 9 but committed to scheduling the item for a detailed hearing and deliberation on Oct. 3.