Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Forecast topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
LFC and state economists warn of long-term fiscal pressures from demographics, retiree-health distributions and nonrecurring spending
Summary
DF&A and LFC presentations show a modest long-run revenue baseline, demographic headwinds, and a growing statutory distribution to the Retiree Health Care Authority that could crowd out PIT growth; committee discussion highlighted reserve needs and the risks of committing nonrecurring funds to recurring obligations.
Get email alerts on the Budget Forecast topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Economists from the Department of Finance and Administration, Taxation & Revenue and the Legislative Finance Committee presented a long-term revenue outlook that projects modest baseline growth for New Mexico but highlights structural risks.
Leo Delgado (DF&A) described the consensus forecasting process and explained that the baseline excludes recessions or major policy shocks. Demographic projections show a shrinking base of younger cohorts and a plateauing working-age population in the decades ahead, which will put downward pressure on wages, incomes and tax revenue unless productivity or participation increases.
LFC staff presented charts showing a "treadmill" pattern: in recent biennia the Legislature has committed a rising share of nonrecurring dollars into future-year obligations, reducing available nonrecurring capacity in subsequent years. Staff warned that the state's statutory 12% annual distribution to the Retiree Health Care Authority is compounding and could consume a growing share of personal-income-tax (PIT) collections over time unless adjusted.
"If no fix is taken into account, retiree health care distributions could eventually take up all of the personal income taxes in the state by FY70," LFC analysis said, and staff suggested right-sizing the distribution so the authority becomes appropriately funded without crowding out other priorities.
LFC and Taxation staff ran "Goldilocks" scenarios for sustainable recurring spending: 6% recurring budget growth could sustain about a decade of added spending, while 10% would accelerate the need for cuts within five years. Committee members asked staff what reserve level would be needed to withstand a simultaneous oil-price shock and loss of federal funding; staff estimated that a two-year severe shock could require on the order of $2.7'$3.2 billion (roughly a mid-30% range of reserves) to avoid deep cuts, and cautioned that some reserve accounts are not ideal liquidity buffers.
On energy, DF&A noted that Rystad Energy's updated scenarios show continued Permian production growth at a decelerating pace and greater long-run demand for U.S. natural gas (LNG), but stressed that commodity price and production forecasts are highly uncertain. Several members emphasized that the long-term plan to shift the revenue mix and invest nonrecurring balances into diversification remains a priority to reduce volatility.
Committee members requested follow-up on sector-level drivers of the projected real gross state product, more detailed scenarios for retiree health distributions, and options for rebalancing nonrecurring commitments into reserves ahead of the session.
