Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Septic Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission discusses new septic‑system rules, tables amendment for further review
Summary
The planning commission reviewed proposed code language to regulate septic systems after a recent permit inquiry, debated overlap with county inspections and enforcement, and voted to table the proposed amendment pending comparisons with county and state rules.
The Genola Planning Commission spent extensive time Sept. 4 vetting draft language that would add regulations for septic‑tank installations to town code.
Town counsel and staff said they compiled language from several cities to address scenarios the town has encountered, including installations on adjacent lots, multiple septic systems on one lot, and systems crossing roads. Commissioners raised concerns about redundancy with Utah County’s permitting and inspection processes. One commissioner noted county inspectors already check installation details and lid locations; another asked whether the town’s building inspector is qualified to assess septic designs.
Members discussed several specific points: requiring that septic systems be installed on the same legal lot as the dwelling they serve (a provision staff labeled as item 6), avoiding septic installations that cross public roads or proposed roads, and ensuring state minimum distances from property lines or watercourses are enforced. Commissioners suggested staff compare draft language to county and state code, remove redundant requirements, and clarify whether the town would act as an observer or an inspector.
After discussion and public input, the commission voted to table the proposed amendment and asked staff to return with revisions that reconcile county and state rules and to provide a clearer list of the problems the code changes seek to address.
