Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policing And Civil Rights topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission decides not to distribute 'know your rights' cards after law-enforcement warns they 'oversimplify the law'
Summary
Commission members read bilingual ‘know your rights’ cards and discussed whether to distribute them; a speaker representing law-enforcement concerns said the cards 'oversimplify the law' and could trigger exemptions or 'lead to a use of force incident,' and the commission decided not to promote the cards.
During member comments at the Troy Patients Commission meeting, a commission member (S1) presented bilingual resource cards intended for residents and read sections aloud intended to explain constitutional protections.
S1 read a passage describing refusal to speak and refusal to consent to entry: "I do not wish to speak with you, answer your questions, or sign or hand you any documents based on the Fifth Amendment rights under United States Constitution. I do not give you permission to enter my home based on Fourth Amendment rights under The United States Constitution unless you have a warrant to enter signed by a judge or magistrate." S1 said the cards were provided by Legal Aid and ABLE and were available in Montgomery County and in Spanish and English.
Unidentified Speaker S3 responded that, "Based on your reading of this, I I would say it oversimplifies the law," and warned that common legal exceptions — including exigent circumstances and the plain view doctrine — mean an officer may lawfully enter or search in some situations. S3 said pressing the card literally could create probable cause or reasonable suspicion and cautioned that "by forcing this issue, I I would be concerned that it may lead to a use of force incident." S3 also referenced points from "Sergeant Masurian" in the discussion.
Following the exchange, S1 said the commission would not distribute or promote the cards: "So then that's not something that we're gonna pass out or promote." No formal vote was recorded on the matter in the transcript.
Why it matters: The exchange highlights tensions between providing residents with information about constitutional rights and concerns from law-enforcement about how simplified messaging could affect on-the-ground interactions. The commission’s decision was to refrain from distributing the particular card discussed.
Next steps: The commission did not adopt the cards for distribution and did not record additional follow-up in the meeting transcript.
