Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Rewrite topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fraser commissioners press for line-by-line review of proposed zoning rewrite; staff to draft corner-lot fence change and focus topics
Summary
Commissioners said the August 18 primary draft of Fraser's zoning rewrite is too different from the existing code to approve quickly, raised concerns over setbacks, fence spacing and map changes, and asked staff to provide a list of substantive edits, prioritize residential/commercial/industrial/use standards, and draft a corner-lot fence amendment for review.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Rewrite topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fraser's Planning Commission spent much of its Nov. 5 meeting on a contested review of a comprehensive zoning ordinance rewrite (August 18 draft), with several commissioners saying the document needs line-by-line review and clearer incorporation of steering-committee edits before the commission can recommend adoption.
Sarah, who presented the rewrite status, said attorneys are reviewing administrative sections and staff hopes to prepare a draft 2 for the steering committee and planning commission with a target for adoption by council in March or April. She told commissioners the process has included steering-committee meetings and ZBA input and that the rewrite is grant-funded and must be completed next summer.
Several commissioners pressed that the steering-committee changes were not fully reflected in the draft. "If it's with the steering committee, I have serious problems that all of the steering committee stuff is not in here," one commissioner said, adding that without a full line-by-line review "I will not vote for it to recommend it to the council." Commissioners raised specific concerns about new setback requirements for mechanical units, proposed minimum spacing between fences (two feet, with some asking that be three feet), changes in the zoning map that could reclassify residential parcels, and how accessory dwelling unit rules apply.
Commissioners and staff agreed on a practical next step: staff will provide a clear list of substantive changes from the August 18 draft, prioritize review of district summaries (residential, commercial, industrial) and use standards, and draft a focused amendment on corner-lot fences that allows privacy fences where clear-vision triangles are preserved. Staff said it will prepare materials before a December meeting and that additional meetings will likely be required.
Commissioners emphasized the real-world implications for property owners: variances can cost several hundred or thousands of dollars and longstanding lawful uses should not be unexpectedly made nonconforming. Staff reiterated that existing lawful uses would not be applied retrospectively and that the rewrite can be adjusted through subsequent amendments.
The commission set direction to concentrate work on sections that most affect residents — district summaries, use standards, and enforcement provisions — and agreed to continue the review in December and in subsequent sessions ahead of a spring council vote.

