Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Mount Clemens approves agreement tying $20.7 million state allocation to downtown housing project

Mount Clemens City Commission · January 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City Commission approved an amended operating agreement with Manchester Mount Clemens LLC that links a $20,705,000 Michigan State Housing Development Authority allocation to a 100-unit downtown project; the city will retain an 8% equity stake and officials said taxpayers face no additional liability.

Mount Clemens City Commissioners voted to approve an amended and restated operating agreement with Manchester Mount Clemens LLC that would commit up to $20,705,000 — contingent on receipt of funds from the Michigan State Housing Development Authority — toward a planned downtown housing project and secure an 8% ownership interest for the city.

The commission approved the measure after a presentation from city staff and the developer’s representative, and after commissioners pressed staff on liability and timeline questions. "It does not" create taxpayer liability if the developer fails to pay vendors, one commissioner said during the discussion, noting the agreement requires indemnification and insurance to shield the city.

City staff clarified the $20,705,000 allocation would come from state sources, not the city's general fund. The project is expected to deliver about 100 residential units in the downtown DDA district; commissioners said that scale could significantly increase downtown residency and support local businesses.

Supporters described the arrangement as mainly upside for the city: an 8% stake in a low‑profit limited liability company that stands to benefit if the project succeeds, and limited downside if it does not. Commissioners repeatedly asked what would happen if the developer or the construction entity failed to meet obligations; city counsel and representatives said contractual protections and the structure of the private entity place primary responsibility on the private party.

The motion to approve the amended and restated operating agreement and related contribution agreement passed in roll call vote. The agreements must be finalized and remain contingent on the state funding being received.

The commission’s action moves the project forward to the contribution‑agreement stage and preserves contract protections that officials say prevent direct liability to Mount Clemens taxpayers.