Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Downtown Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning and Zoning panel backs renewal and modest expansion of Iowa City downtown SMID
Summary
The Planning and Zoning Commission voted to forward a staff evaluative report recommending a 10-year renewal and modest boundary expansion of the Downtown Self-Supported Municipal Improvement District, preserving the $2.50 per $1,000 levy for seven years and allowing a possible increase to $2.75 in the final three years; City Council will set a public hearing.
Iowa City’s Planning and Zoning Commission on Oct. 15 voted to forward a staff evaluative report recommending a 10-year renewal and modest expansion of the Downtown Self-Supported Municipal Improvement District (SMID), sending the matter to the City Council for a public hearing and possible ordinance.
Rachel Kilberg Riley, the city’s economic development coordinator, told the commission staff verified the petition submitted by the Iowa City Downtown District met Iowa Code Chapter 386’s requirements, including the 25% signature/assessed-value threshold. The petition would extend the SMID from 07/01/2026 through 06/30/2036 and keep the levy at $2.50 per $1,000 of assessed value for the first seven years; the Downtown District would have the option, with board approval, to raise the levy to $2.75 per $1,000 for the final three years.
"We verified that they met those thresholds," Kilberg Riley said, noting staff’s review found the petition’s boundaries are contiguous, the parcels are appropriately zoned, and the proposal aligns with the comprehensive plan and downtown master plan. Staff estimated levy revenue under the expanded boundary at approximately $1,000,000, which it said would be sufficient to support the district’s proposed activities.
Betsy Potter, executive director of the Iowa City Downtown District, described the organization’s budget and priorities, saying the district plans to use levy revenues for business support, marketing, events, enhanced cleaning and lighting, public art, landscaping and staffing — including ambassador services. "We have an opportunity to include a number of businesses that have wanted to participate for a long time into our organization," Potter said.
Commissioners pressed staff and the Downtown District on fiscal details and effects on property owners. A staff comment described the SMID levy as accounting for about half of the Downtown District’s annual revenue; Potter subsequently described the current budget as roughly one-third from the SMID levy, one-third from event revenue and one-third from city, university and sponsorship support. The commission recorded this difference in testimony but moved forward on the staff recommendation.
A commissioner asked whether residential parcels would be taxed; staff confirmed the SMID levy applies only to commercial parcels designated in the petition. Kilberg Riley said staff received the petition on 09/15/2025, verified the signature and assessed-value thresholds, and would forward the draft evaluative report and a signed chair’s letter to City Council to trigger the formal public-notice and hearing process.
The action on Oct. 15 was a procedural recommendation: a motion to approve and forward the validated evaluative report passed (moved by Speaker 6, seconded by Speaker 1). The commission recorded members 1, 2, 3 and 5 as voting in favor; the motion passed. Following the council public hearing and any council decision, the city and the Downtown District would negotiate a separate operating agreement that would govern how the SMID is administered.
City Council must still set and notice a public hearing by certified mail to affected property owners before it may adopt an ordinance reestablishing or modifying the SMID. If Council approves an ordinance, the operating agreement would follow.
