Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Public Meetings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Attendees watch state auditor's training video on Utah's open-meetings rules; no formal action taken
Summary
A meeting viewed a state auditor's office training video about Utah's Open and Public Meetings Act covering when meetings may be closed, required notice, recording rules and vote thresholds; participants requested a replay for clarification and adjourned without taking formal votes.
Get email alerts on the Open Public Meetings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A local meeting played a training video produced by the state auditor's office that summarized requirements of Utah's Open and Public Meetings Act and related notice and recordkeeping duties, then adjourned without taking formal action.
The video narrator explained the law as "the state law that ensures government actions and deliberations are overlooked," and listed meeting types the law covers, including workshops, executive sessions, regular meetings, public hearings, electronic meetings and emergency meetings. "So what is the open public meetings act? It's the state law that ensures government actions and deliberations are overlooked," the narrator said.
The training highlighted exceptions that may justify holding a closed meeting, including water-rights matters, security devices and systems deployment, criminal investigations, certain private or protected information, and trade secrets tied to the procurement code. The narrator also described voting thresholds for closing a meeting: with five members present, "3 out of 5 members vote yes, that equals 60% which is not equal or greater than 66.7%," and therefore the video said the body would need four of five votes to close the meeting.
On recordkeeping, the video said some closed-meeting topics (for example, certain health or security matters) may not require public minutes or recordings, while other closed meetings must have a recording that includes date, time, place and names of members present and absent and of others attending unless disclosure would infringe necessary confidentiality; where required, the presiding member must sign a sworn written statement. The narrator also described notice requirements, saying regular open meetings require 24 hours' notice and that the public notice should include the meeting, agenda and place. The transcript records the video referencing a Utah code citation (transcribed as "Utah code 63 g Dash30 dash 1 0").
The video stated that posting on the public notice website is typically done by the records officer, recorder or clerk but that the governing body remains responsible for ensuring notice is provided. It also said that within three business days after an open meeting, an audio recording of the meeting must be made available to the public for listening.
After the presentation, attendees asked to replay the video and slow portions down for clarification. One attendee said, "We are now officially trained." The host asked Brad to follow up with an absent colleague so that person could review the material. There were no formal motions or votes; the meeting concluded after the group confirmed there was no need for a closed session.
The training as presented in the video focused on compliance and transparency obligations; participants sought additional playback to ensure they understood specific requirements for closed meetings, recording and notice.
