Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Design Reviews Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Design Review Board approves several Laguna Beach projects, adds conditions and continuances
Summary
The Laguna Beach Design Review Board approved multiple residential design reviews (including 1215 La Mirada, 1782 Ocean Way, 2495 Monaco and 26 Lagunita) with standard CEQA exemptions, added conditions on one pool/ fence item, and continued two heavily contested matters (399 Pearl and 610 Mystic View) for revisions and neighbor coordination.
The Laguna Beach Design Review Board voted Jan. 28 to approve several residential projects and to continue several others after public comment and board deliberation.
Key outcomes at a glance:
- Approved 1215 La Mirada (Design Review 2025‑1613). Staff found the modest addition and deck changes compatible with the neighborhood and exempt from CEQA (15301); board vote 5‑0.
- Approved 1782 Ocean Way (Design Review 25‑2150; CDP 25‑2151) for additions and an elevator serving two units; staff reported no neighbor objections and recommended a categorical CEQA exemption; board vote 5‑0.
- Approved 2495 Monaco (Design Review 25‑2392) for a redesign that converts internal driveway space to a courtyard, adds pool and reconfigures garages; the project has HOA approval and received unanimous board support.
- Approved 26 Lagunita Drive (Design Review and CDP) with one explicit condition: two ground‑level garage windows will be made opaque to address neighbor privacy concerns; board vote 5‑0.
- The board also handled consent and multiple continuances: consent calendar item 4.1 (645 Buena Vista) passed 5‑0; a group of continuances listed by the chair were approved 5‑0.
Several projects were continued for additional work or neighborhood outreach: 1025 Cortez (pool and fencing) was continued so the applicant can propose alternative fence materials or limit fencing to the pool perimeter; 399 Pearl (ADU and building site coverage) and 610 Mystic View (large new house) were both continued to allow the applicant to address neighbor privacy, building‑site‑coverage and geotechnical/landscape concerns.
Board votes and staff resolutions were read into the record; the DRB applied CEQA categorical exemptions where staff recommended them.
