Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Urban Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee refers University Boulevard overlay ZTA after adding workforce-housing and MPDU language

Planning, Housing, and Parks Committee · December 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee voted 2-1 to refer ZTA 25-12 (University Boulevard overlay) to the full council after adopting a workforce-housing requirement (one workforce unit or 15% of units, whichever is greater) and clarifying that a 15% MPDU target would cover the entire plan boundary.

The Planning, Housing and Parks Committee voted 2-1 to refer Zoning Text Amendment 25-12, which creates a University Boulevard overlay zone, to the full council after adopting workforce-housing and technical amendments.

Ms. Nadeau summarized the ZTA’s purpose: to implement recommendations from the University Boulevard Corridor master plan by establishing an overlay that permits accessory dwelling units in CRN, allows CRN properties to include certain nonresidential uses consistent with R-60 standards, prohibits auto-centric uses such as gas stations and drive-throughs, and requires on-site parking behind the front building line to promote a pedestrian-oriented corridor.

Planning board technical edits adopted by the committee included changing a 35% "lot coverage" reference to "site coverage" and specifying the duplex building type used for smaller sites. The committee also adopted a workforce-housing amendment proposed by Chair Friesen and Councilmember Fanny Gonzalez: properties with three or more units must include at least one workforce housing unit or 15% of total units, whichever is greater, and DPS may not issue a building permit until DHCA signs a written workforce-housing agreement consistent with chapter 25.

Councilmember Madrona voiced concerns about displacement and said a stronger trigger (for example, every two units instead of every three) would produce more affordable units; other members said the committee was choosing incremental progress over perfection and supported the adopted language.

Staff and a planning supervisor explained that chapter 25A already allows master plans to require up to 15% MPDUs and that including explicit 15% MPDU language in the overlay makes the expectation clear across the entire plan boundary, consistent with practice in other overlay zones.

By a 2-1 vote the committee referred the amended ZTA to the full council for consideration.