Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council reviews kennel definitions and proposes raising general dog limit to three per household (apartments limited to two)
Summary
Council discussed ordinance 2025-7 to add definitions for commercial and hobby kennels and to change zone-based dog limits — allowing three dogs in most zones while keeping apartments at two; council cited enforcement and resource constraints and discussed licensing setbacks and fees.
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Orangeville council discussed ordinance 2025-7 on August 14, which adds definitions for commercial and hobby kennels and revises limits on the number of dogs allowed by zone. Speaker 5 (Amanda) outlined the new definitions: a commercial kennel covers premises where six or more dogs are boarded, bred, groomed, sold or trained for a fee, while a hobby kennel covers premises where four to five dogs older than three months are kept.
Speaker 1 supported increasing the general household limit from two to three dogs outside of apartments, saying enforcement resources are limited and nuisance enforcement should address problem animals. "If someone has 3 dogs and those dogs are not causing a problem, what's the big deal in my opinion?" Speaker 1 said. The council discussed setbacks, kennel licensing requirements (including distance rules from property lines and roads), and the difficulty for some properties to meet strict hobby/commercial kennel criteria.
Amanda noted apartments would remain capped at two dogs; other zones would be allowed three dogs without a kennel license. Council members urged planning and zoning to review license processes and setback requirements and discussed potential revenue from kennel licensing.
Why it matters: changes to dog limits and kennel definitions affect homeowners, renters, animal-control enforcement and the permitting process. The item was discussed but not adopted; council did not record a final vote on ordinance 2025-7 at this meeting.
