Board approves block agenda; one trustee abstains on personnel-related item
Loading...
Summary
The Westbury UFSD Board approved the consent/block agenda, confirmed several agenda items were withdrawn for rescheduling, and approved item 6e with Trustee Wilson abstaining due to family ties; the meeting adjourned and next meeting is scheduled for February.
The Westbury Union Free School District Board of Education moved through the published action agenda on July 27, voting to approve the consent/block package after the superintendent withdrew several items that were not ready to vote.
Board leadership announced withdrawals for items 6r and 6s (agreements with staff members) and for resolutions 7f and 7g (consultant/retreat services) and noted those items will return at the February meeting. The superintendent also called out that item 13d (use of facilities) was withdrawn.
Board members then considered item 6e separately. Trustee Dr. Dickerson moved approval; the motion was seconded and carried after a roll-call vote in which Trustee Michelle Wilson announced an abstention, citing family ties to a member referenced in the resolution. The clerk recorded the abstention and the remaining trustees voted aye.
After approving item 6e, the board moved to approve the remaining items as a block vote; the roll call recorded unanimous ayes among the trustees present for the block. Board members closed the meeting with a motion to adjourn that passed unanimously and confirmed the next meeting will be held in February.
During the public-comment portion that preceded voting, parents and residents asked for clarifications about contracts and programs: an LIU course offering (cost per course listed on the agenda as $2.90), a Nassau County student-workforce selection process, construction RFP questions about Elite Construction (district staff said there was a single bidder and delays were tied to supply-chain and state approvals), concerns about bathroom searches and vaping detectors (administrator counsel described reasonable-suspicion standards and said private follow-up was appropriate), and questions about the district’s special education three-year plan and Medicaid billing improvements. Administrators promised follow-up and documentation at future meetings.
