Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Juvenile Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
LFC data show juvenile referrals remain below pre‑pandemic levels but behavioral-health gaps leave many youth without services
Summary
A Legislative Finance Committee preview described long-term declines in juvenile referrals since FY19 with a recent uptick from the pandemic low; LFC highlighted that most referrals are low-level misdemeanors, many are handled informally without systematic service data, and behavioral-health capacity gaps lead to cycling back into the system.
Get email alerts on the Juvenile Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Analysts from the Legislative Finance Committee told the Legislative Health & Human Services Committee that juvenile-justice referrals have risen from the COVID-era low but remain roughly 30% below fiscal‑year 2019 levels, and that most referrals are for lower-level misdemeanors handled outside court.
"Reports of juvenile crime ... reached a low point in FY21 during the pandemic and has recently increased since the pandemic low point," Clayton Lobaugh, program evaluator, told members. He said the most frequent charges include battery, drug-paraphernalia possession and shoplifting.
LFC’s analysis emphasized two concerns: first, about 57% of referrals are handled informally by CYFD juvenile-probation staff and the department does not systematically record the specific services provided; second, gaps and declines in behavioral‑health and treatment services mean diverted youth frequently reenter the system.
The committee heard that district attorneys file court cases on roughly two-thirds of forwarded referrals and decline about a quarter. LFC noted that county detention centers currently have excess physical bed capacity but are constrained by staffing and federal juvenile-staffing ratios.
LFC presented spending and cost information showing that secure facility placement is far more expensive per youth than community supervision or prevention programming and encouraged investing in front-end prevention and therapeutic programs (for example, multisystemic therapy) to reduce long‑term delinquency.
Committee members repeatedly requested demographic breakdowns (race, ethnicity, income) and clearer reporting on how prevention grants are spent; in response, the committee approved a motion to write to LFC and CYFD asking that those measures be included in departmental reports and performance metrics.
Ending: LFC will finalize its juvenile-justice report later this month; committee members asked analysts to include demographic and program-sustainability details in the final product.
