Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Utility Rates topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council directs staff to revise nonprofit electric discount funding, consider expanding eligibility
Summary
Council directed staff to change the funding source for the electric-utility Community Benefits Incentive Discount (CBID) from ratepayer charges to the utility's public-benefits fund and to revise eligibility so nonprofits serving low-income/disadvantaged populations can demonstrate qualification.
Get email alerts on the Utility Rates topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Lodi City Council on Oct. 15 directed staff to pursue changing how the municipal electric utility funds a 30% community-benefit discount for certain nonprofit customers and to revise eligibility criteria to better reach nonprofits that serve low-income and disadvantaged communities.
Assistant Electric Utility Director Melissa Price told council the CBID, adopted in 1996, provides a 30% monthly discount to qualifying 501(c)(3) organizations that have been Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) recipients within the last two years. Price said roughly 14 utility accounts (representing 9 entities) currently receive the discount and the annual cost is about $30,000.
Price warned that Proposition 26 raises legal concerns about a ratepayer-funded subsidy and presented three options: shift the program’s funding to the utility’s public-benefits fund, broaden and clarify eligibility with a self-certification process for nonprofits serving low-income populations, or eliminate the discount. She recommended changing the funding source and refining eligibility.
Council discussed expanding the CBID beyond strict two-year CDBG recipients so organizations that demonstrate service to disadvantaged communities could qualify. One council member suggested a short self-certification process and staff said the public-benefits fund is legally appropriate if awards benefit low-income or disadvantaged communities.
A motion directing staff to pursue Option 1—shifting funding to public-benefits funds and revising eligibility criteria to allow demonstration of service to low-income/disadvantaged communities—was made, seconded and passed. Staff said ordinance changes to rate-class definitions would be required and could be implemented by year-end with public notice and a hearing.
Next steps: Staff will draft code changes to shift funding and set objective eligibility criteria, return to council with an ordinance amendment and a public hearing, and coordinate outreach to possible nonprofit applicants.

