Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning And Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lodi delays general‑plan RFP after property owners and council ask for utility and MSR detail
Summary
Councilors and property owners urged more utility, financing and municipal‑service information before issuing a $1.5M general‑plan RFP. Staff agreed to prepare utility/financing cost data (MSR‑style analyses) and return with recommendations early next year.
The Lodi City Council paused issuance of a draft request for proposals (RFP) to update the city’s general plan on Nov. 5 and directed staff to develop additional utility and financing information for proposed annexation areas.
Community development staff had presented a draft RFP for an 18–24 month general‑plan update (budgeted at $1.5 million) that would include two precise plans for the South study area and the East Side sphere of influence (SOI). Staff proposed a Dec. 18 deadline for proposals, finalist interviews in mid‑January, and a contract award by March.
Several property owners, residents and business groups urged the council to postpone drafting and issuing the RFP until utility and service capacity questions (power, stormwater, water/wastewater) were resolved or more thoroughly analyzed. "Council needs to have a new permanent city manager, a new permanent public works director...in place before beginning any activity related to the 2030 general plan preparation," one property owner said, arguing incoming leadership should help shape an RFP and consultant selection.
What council decided: staff and several councilmembers recommended preparing MSR‑style (municipal service review) information and targeted utility/financing costs (e.g., stormwater retention, sewer/water extension, and potential financing districts such as CFDs) before advancing the precise plan work. City staff and council agreed to return with those analyses "early next year" to support annexation financing and to inform any RFP decisions, while allowing straightforward adjacent annexations to proceed where utility connections are already available.
Why it matters: annexations and the precise plans will determine where new housing and industrial development may be approved; financing plans (for infrastructure and CFDs) are prerequisites for LAFCO annexation submissions. Staff said delaying RFP issuance will slow general‑plan‑level annexation streamlining but will offer more complete cost and feasibility data for property owners and the council.
Next steps: staff will prepare detailed utility needs and cost estimates and present them to council in the coming months for direction; the RFP may be reissued once the council has reviewed those analyses and additional planning priorities.
