Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Restaurant Week And Accreditation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Clawson DDA discusses Restaurant Week website and Main Street re-evaluation
Summary
The DDA promotion committee outlined plans for Restaurant Week (proposed March dates) and the board authorized moving forward with a modest website/marketing budget; members also reviewed Oakland County Main Street accreditation timing and participation requests.
Get email alerts on the Restaurant Week And Accreditation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Clawson Downtown Development Authority reviewed promotion plans for a spring Restaurant Week and debated a modest budget for a dedicated website to centralize event details and vendor specials.
Speaker 1 reported the promotion committee met and recommended holding Restaurant Week March 22–28 and including all Clawson restaurants, not only those in the DDA. The board discussed short promotional videos, QR-code placards, and working with restaurants and influencers to boost visibility.
Speaker 2 moved to create a budget to support a Restaurant Week website. Debate focused on the dollar amount; Speaker 3 noted minimal costs for domain and hosting ("maybe a $2 for the year for a domain and then... $20 a month"), and proposed amending the motion to include a $250 placeholder for the site build/hosting. The transcript indicates the motion was amended and proceeded, but the final approved dollar limit was not explicitly recorded.
Separately, Speaker 2 asked members to review the Oakland County Main Street awards catalog and noted the accreditation visit (evaluation) would occur in February; applications for awards were due April 17. Speakers clarified that Clawson is being evaluated under "select level" standards and that the visit is part of a transition year rather than a formal sanction.
Next steps include staff compiling promotional materials, starting a temporary web presence or site for Restaurant Week, and returning with a firm budget and timeline. The record does not include a detailed roll-call vote for the website motion; approval was reached in discussion with an amended figure mentioned in the meeting.

