Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Development Regulations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff walk council through major revisions to land development regulations
Summary
Staff presented proposed edits to Newberry County's land development regulations (chapter 154), explaining subdivision classifications, plat types, financial guarantees (150% bonded final plat requirement), appeals timelines, design standards and gated-subdivision and road-access rules. Council asked about cemetery protection and staff offered GIS and survey options.
Mister Shacker, the county staff presenter, spent the work session reviewing proposed revisions to Newberry County's land development regulations (chapter 154), telling the council the goal is to finish review so the board can take first reading at its Feb. 5 meeting.
Shacker said the draft distinguishes minor and major subdivisions, explains four plat types (sketch, preliminary, final and bonded final) and ties preliminary-plat requirements to studies such as traffic, wetlands and stormwater. "The preliminary plat is really the workhorse of the process," he said, and staff must confirm preliminary conditions are carried through to the final plat.
On financial assurances, staff described two distinct protections. When a developer records a bonded final plat because improvements are not complete, the county requires a developer's cost estimate reviewed by staff and, if necessary, a consulting engineer, and a financial guarantee equal to 150% of that estimate, held with a bank in Newberry County and structured to give the county direct access. For roads already accepted by the county, Shacker said the county holds a warranty retention of 20% of the road and drainage cost for a two-year warranty period to cover defects before releasing funds.
Shacker outlined administrative timelines: Katie (county planning staff) has 15 days after the planning commission meeting to notify applicants of approval or denial; denials require a written explanation within five days; appeals first return to the planning commission and can then be taken to circuit court within the timetable described in the ordinance.
The draft also moves many technical road standards into chapter 91 (the recently adopted road ordinance) and keeps minimum design standards in the LDR. Shacker summarized access rules: multifamily developments above certain sizes and one- and two-family developments above specified unit counts require two access roads (with exceptions if buildings are sprinklered), and the county's street and intersection standards set minimum angles and spacing to improve safety.
Councilmembers raised questions about how the county protects cemeteries on private land when development occurs. An unidentified councilmember asked whether the county could proactively protect unmarked graves; a staff speaker recommended that families or sellers survey and parcel cemeteries as their own lots or place them in green space. Shacker noted the county maintains a GIS layer of cemeteries but that it does not always show parcel ownership; he said adding a parcel-linked cemetery layer would help identify and protect burial sites.
Shacker told the council staff could continue with section 51 (easements) at the next work session and offered to provide a shorter, bullet-style written summary for the public and council to aid preparation for first reading.
The work session did not include any final policy votes on the ordinance language; it was a staff-level review and question-and-answer period. The council will revisit the draft for any remaining changes before first reading on Feb. 5.
