Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Meetings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City attorney briefs Modesto CPRB on Brown Act, ad hoc limits and remote participation rules
Summary
Assistant City Attorney Alex Mogg gave a Brown Act overview to the Modesto CPRB, explaining what constitutes a legislative body and meeting, limits on ad hoc committees (members only, less than a quorum), risks of serial communications by email or social media, and the AB 2449 rules for remote participation.
Assistant City Attorney Alex Mogg presented a Brown Act training to the Modesto Community Police Review Board, emphasizing the law's core requirement that meetings of legislative bodies be open to the public and the limits that imposes on board communications and ad hoc committees.
"The Ralph M. Brown Act is the state's open meeting law," Mogg said, adding that "the basic requirement of the Brown Act is that meetings of legislative bodies shall be open to the public and all persons shall be permitted to attend any meeting." He described who qualifies as a "legislative body," the definition of a "meeting," and exceptions for ad hoc committees: an ad hoc committee must be comprised only of board members, contain fewer than a quorum, and have a limited purpose with an end date.
Mogg warned that serial communications — including hub-and-spoke and daisy-chain patterns — can create an unintended majority and run afoul of the Brown Act, and cautioned board members that replying-all in email chains or interacting with one another on social-media posts about board business can create violations. He explained that a third-party article may be forwarded to members, but members' commentary on substantive issues should not be forwarded in a way that would reveal private deliberations.
On remote participation, Mogg discussed AB 2449: members may participate remotely for "just cause" (examples include illness, caregiving, official travel or military service) up to twice per year without posting the remote address on the agenda, provided they use audio‑visual technology and make the required announcement at the meeting start. He also noted the city's practice of encouraging in-person attendance when possible.
Board members asked practical questions about community events, posting meeting dates on social media, and whether the CPRB could sponsor town halls or deploy alternates to respond to urgent scene calls; Mogg and staff responded with clarifications about agenda posting, ad hoc composition and limitations on closed-session authority for advisory bodies. The training closed with staff offering to follow up on procedural questions and to provide further materials for the board.
