Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Finance Receivables topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wyoming Valley West board approves receivables agreement; members discuss dedicating proceeds to capital or short-term investments
Summary
The board approved an agreement to sell delinquent-tax accounts receivable. A public questioner sought assurance that taxpayers would not pay less or face additional fees; staff said the sale would not reduce tax collections or add penalties. Board members estimated $90,000–$95,000 in additional interest income from receiving proceeds up front and will consider fund designation at a future meeting.
The Wyoming Valley West School District board approved an agreement to sell delinquent-tax receivables during its Jan. 28 special meeting and addressed questions about the impact on taxpayers. An audience member identified as "Mister Geronimo" asked whether the district would collect less tax revenue under the agreement and whether the purchasing organization could add late fees or penalties. A staff respondent answered, "That's absolutely correct," stating the purchase would not reduce collections and that the purchaser would not impose additional fees on taxpayers as a result of the sale.
Board discussion then turned to the practical use of the upfront proceeds. One board member said their calculation showed the district would receive approximately $90,000 to $95,000 in additional interest income from receiving delinquent-tax proceeds up front. Members discussed placing the funds into a separate delinquent-tax bank account already in use, or into capital-improvement accounts, and noted options to invest in short-term money-market funds or short-term certificates of deposit. The board asked staff to place the topic on a future agenda so the full board could decide how to allocate or invest the funds.
The agreement was considered as part of a package of general recommended action items (items 1–4), which the board approved by roll-call vote. Board members did not specify a purchaser's name in the transcript, nor did they provide a written breakdown of the purchaser's terms during the meeting; the transcript records only the staff assurance that the sale would not change the district’s net tax collections or add additional penalties for taxpayers.
The board proceeded to approve staff-recommended item 1 later in the meeting and then announced upcoming meetings on Feb. 4 and Feb. 11 before adjourning.
