Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cannabis Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council adopts commercial permit procedures for cannabis testing laboratories; two councilmembers dissent
Summary
Council adopted procedural guidelines to permit cannabis testing laboratories (no retail sales) and directed staff to return with application fees; two members voted no, citing distribution concerns and related land‑use questions.
The City Council adopted commercial business-permit procedures for cannabis testing laboratories on Oct. 28 after staff outlined a streamlined application and review process.
Jennifer Lilly, presenting the item, said testing laboratories are typically technical facilities used to analyze samples and do not function as retail outlets. Her presentation described an initial screening review for land control and background checks, followed by final permit approval and an operational agreement to be brought back to council for review.
"There's a perception about testing laboratories that they have product there that people can go and buy things there. It's really your normal testing laboratory," Lilly said, explaining that the proposed guidelines are intended to manage the land-use and operational aspects without expanding retail cannabis capacity.
Council discussion touched on zoning, distribution of future labs across wards and the ability of the council to adjust ordinances later if it wishes to limit numbers or locations. Councilmember Falcone said he would not support the measure because of concerns about uneven distribution in industrial areas on the north side of the city; the motion to adopt the procedures passed with two no votes (Ward 1 and Ward 6).
Staff will return at a later public hearing with proposed fees and any additional permit language; council may later consider overlay restrictions or numeric caps by ordinance.
