Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Riverside hears plan for $16.8M animal‑services contract and $816,000 community program; council debate focuses on cost and county role
Summary
City staff presented a proposed three‑year (FY26–28) sheltering and field‑services agreement with Riverside County Department of Animal Services totaling $16.8 million and requested a supplemental $816,000 appropriation for community programs (microchip scanners, spay/neuter partnerships and adoption events). Councilmembers pressed county cost‑sharing, meeting‑hour billing language and program scale; a motion was made but the transcript does not record a detailed roll‑call tally.
Riverside — City staff on Nov. 18 asked the City Council to approve a three‑year agreement with the Riverside County Department of Animal Services (DAS) covering sheltering and field services with a contract cost of $16.8 million for fiscal years 2026–28 and a proposed $816,000 supplemental appropriation to fund community programs aimed at reducing shelter intake.
Diana Pilato, presenting the report, said the county shelter has been partially subsidizing services for contract cities and that Riverside accounted for 24.6% of county impounds between July 2022 and Dec. 2024. DAS is proposing expanded life‑saving programs and planned staffing increases to reduce euthanasia rates that had been high in recent years. Pilato outlined a hybrid cost‑recovery model and described proposed community programs that include a microchip‑scanner pilot sited at libraries or fire stations, partnerships with veterinarians for low‑cost spay/neuter services, and adoption events to reduce shelter population.
A chamber speaker, Carrie Ridgeway of Marius Roberts Pet Adoption Center, urged the council to fund the microchip scanner pilot, citing data from Albuquerque where similar kiosks reduced shelter intake and increased reunions. Councilmembers broadly expressed concern about the size of the contract and debated whether the county or cities should shoulder the cost of a county‑operated shelter. Councilmembers also questioned contract language that limits no‑charge meetings and caps certain free reports or staff hours before charging hourly rates; some said those provisions felt inconsistent with intergovernmental partnership.
Pilato said the supplemental appropriation would be used for spay/neuter events, community outreach and partnerships that she argued could reduce the year‑three contract price if kennel numbers decline as planned.
The transcript records a motion and second and extended council discussion; a formal roll‑call tally for the contract item is not included in the recorded excerpt of the meeting. Council asked staff for ongoing updates on DAS implementation, staffing, and program outcomes if the agreement proceeds.
