Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the DEI Policy And Campus Climate topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Faculty, students and community speakers urge board to pause DEI rollback and address campus climate
Summary
During public comment at the Nov. 11 board meeting, multiple UIC faculty, students and staff warned that recent system policies rolling back diversity, equity and inclusion commitments harm student belonging, faculty governance and programs supporting underrepresented students and asked the board for transparency and a pause on implementation.
Multiple public speakers used the University of Illinois Board of Trustees’ Nov. 11 public comment period to press trustees to reverse or pause recent changes described by commenters as an "anti‑DEI" policy and to address campus climate and cultural‑center funding.
Jeremiah Abiade urged trustees to make undergraduate STEM research a core priority and warned that the system’s recent directive prohibiting race‑conscious consideration in financial aid and scholarships "threatens to undo this progress." Abiade asked the board to reverse the policy and to respond in writing on whether the changes comply with Public Act 102‑1046.
Cynthia Blair, director of UIC’s Black Cultural Center, told trustees that Black and Brown students feel "abandoned" by the rollback and said faculty and students reported a deepening sense of insecurity and anger. Professor David Crockett asked the board to "pause the implementation, rescind these directives," and argued that editorial changes to promotion and tenure dossiers would threaten shared governance and academic freedom.
Other commenters including Elizabeth Todd Breland echoed the compliance question, citing Illinois Public Act 102‑1046 and urging transparency on how the system will fulfill statutory obligations to increase access, retention and completion for minority students.
Student speakers raised related concerns about underfunding of cultural centers and cuts to ethnic studies. Ariana Vega, a student co‑chair of New SDS at UIC, said culture centers were operating on minimal budgets and demanded increased funding, a community‑led town hall including Chancellor Miranda, and that the administration meet substantive student demands.
Board members did not take immediate formal action during the public‑comment period. Chair Ruiz apologized later in the meeting when a signed‑up commenter was not admitted due to a capacity issue and invited written comments to be circulated to trustees.
The public comments highlight points of tension the board may revisit in future committee meetings or through requests for written responses from administration; commenters asked specifically for an accounting of legal compliance and for the board to rescind and pause policy changes while campuses and constituencies are consulted.
