Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the State Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Councilors discuss 911 funding bill and county revenue pressure from Senate Bill 1

Dearborn County Council · January 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council members discussed pending state legislation to raise the 911 fee and broader county revenue shortfalls tied to last year’s Senate Bill 1; they noted a state senator’s support but committee-level resistance could delay action.

Council members discussed pending legislation at the state level that would increase 911 funding and the broader fiscal pressure counties are experiencing from property-tax changes enacted in Senate Bill 1.

Speaker 5 raised that there was movement on 911 legislation and Speaker 2 said the bill had been referred to Homeland Security and Transportation and that Senator Maxwell supports it and is advocating for passage this year (SEG 563-577). Speaker 2 also said a committee chair suggested treating it as a fiscal bill and possibly bumping it to next year; councilors discussed the uncertainty and the potential effect on county finances (SEG 564-576, 635-637).

Separately, Speaker 4 referenced ongoing discussion about county shortfalls resulting from property-tax rebate and change provisions in Senate Bill 1 and suggested counties hope for corrective measures (SEG 587-594). Members described the upcoming legislative session as potentially difficult for counties and noted differing positions among legislators about shifting tax burdens.

No formal county-level lobbying action was recorded; members suggested that Senator Maxwell was already advocating for counties’ interests at the state level.

Quote: "Senator Maxwell is very much aware and very much in our corner and doing what he can to try to move it," (Speaker 2).

Next steps: No local action recorded; councilors discussed monitoring legislative developments and noted limited leverage over committee decisions at the state level.